{"id":7817,"date":"2025-03-07T14:54:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-07T20:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=7817"},"modified":"2025-03-07T14:54:51","modified_gmt":"2025-03-07T20:54:51","slug":"the-truth-about-colbys-nuclear-strategy-billions-wasted-security-undermined","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/the-truth-about-colbys-nuclear-strategy-billions-wasted-security-undermined\/","title":{"rendered":"The Truth About Colby\u2019s Nuclear Strategy: Billions Wasted, Security Undermined"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"\">The recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kfyrtv.com\/2025\/03\/05\/nuclear-triad-upgrades-minot-air-force-base-discussed-senate-committee-hearing\/\" title=\"\">Senate hearing<\/a> on the nomination of Elbridge Colby for <strong>Under Secretary of Defense for Policy<\/strong> made one thing clear: if confirmed, Colby will be yet another advocate for <strong>reckless nuclear expansion<\/strong> at the expense of national security, fiscal responsibility, and global stability. His enthusiastic commitment to upgrading the nuclear triad, including the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/news.usni.org\/2024\/10\/23\/report-to-congress-on-lgm-35a-sentinel-icbm\" title=\"\">controversial Sentinel ICBM program at Minot Air Force Base<\/a><\/strong>, shows a dangerous disregard for both military strategy and taxpayer accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"\">If we are serious about protecting Americans, we must question why we are <strong>spending hundreds of billions of dollars<\/strong> on nuclear weapons systems that do not address the real security threats of today.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">The <strong>Sentinel ICBM program<\/strong>\u2014designed to replace the aging <strong>Minuteman III<\/strong>\u2014comes with an <strong>astonishing $264 billion price tag<\/strong> over its lifetime. Yet, despite its enormous cost, there is little evidence that <strong>land-based ICBMs are necessary for modern deterrence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Sentinel ICBM: A $264 Billion Boondoggle<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">Colby\u2019s endorsement of the Sentinel program ignores key facts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">\ud83d\udea8 <strong>ICBMs make us more vulnerable, not safer.<\/strong> These fixed missile silos in places like Minot are <strong>easy targets for an enemy first strike<\/strong>, making them a liability in nuclear strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">\ud83d\udcb0 <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=7298\" title=\"\">The cost is unjustifiable<\/a>.<\/strong> The U.S. already has a <strong>robust nuclear arsenal<\/strong> with submarine-based missiles (which are harder to detect) and bombers (which offer greater flexibility).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">\ud83d\udcc9 <strong>Even former military officials have questioned the need for new ICBMs.<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/thebulletin.org\/premium\/2020-12\/how-a-us-defense-secretary-came-to-support-the-abolition-of-nuclear-weapons\/\" title=\"\">William Perry,<\/a> former Secretary of Defense, has called land-based missiles \u201cone of the most dangerous threats to national security\u201d and advocated for their elimination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">Colby\u2019s insistence on continuing this <strong>outdated Cold War strategy<\/strong> is both fiscally irresponsible and strategically flawed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Military-Industrial Complex Wins, Americans Lose<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">Colby\u2019s support for nuclear triad upgrades is <strong>not about protecting America\u2014it\u2019s about funneling taxpayer dollars into defense contractors\u2019 pockets<\/strong>. Northrop Grumman, the primary contractor for Sentinel, stands to profit immensely from this program, regardless of its strategic necessity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">Instead of wasting <strong>hundreds of billions<\/strong> on an unnecessary nuclear buildup, we should be directing those funds toward:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li class=\"\"> <strong>Veterans\u2019 healthcare &amp; housing<\/strong>\u2014Many former service members struggle with homelessness and medical care while defense contractors collect massive contracts.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Cybersecurity &amp; emerging threats<\/strong>\u2014China and Russia are advancing in AI and cyber warfare, yet we\u2019re still fixated on Cold War-era missile systems.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"\"><strong>Diplomatic &amp; conflict prevention efforts<\/strong>\u2014Investing in diplomacy and arms control agreements is <strong>far cheaper and more effective<\/strong> at ensuring national security.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>A Dangerous Future Under Colby\u2019s Leadership<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">If confirmed, <strong>Colby will accelerate the wasteful expansion of America\u2019s nuclear arsenal<\/strong>, putting us on a path toward <strong>another arms race<\/strong> with global adversaries. His vision prioritizes nuclear posturing over practical defense and <strong>deepens our dependence on an already bloated Pentagon budget<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"\">The Senate must reject Elbridge Colby\u2019s nomination and demand a defense strategy that <strong>focuses on 21st-century security challenges rather than Cold War relics<\/strong>. The future of national defense should be about <strong>smart, effective investments\u2014not reckless spending on nuclear escalation.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Elbridge Colby\u2019s nomination for Under Secretary of Defense for Policy signals a troubling commitment to reckless nuclear expansion and outdated Cold War strategies. During his Senate hearing, Colby pledged unwavering support for the $264 billion Sentinel ICBM program, despite mounting evidence that land-based nuclear missiles are costly, vulnerable, and strategically obsolete. Instead of focusing on 21st-century security threats like cybersecurity and emerging technologies, Colby champions an unnecessary arms buildup that drains taxpayer dollars and fuels global instability. If confirmed, his leadership would accelerate wasteful Pentagon spending, deepening America\u2019s reliance on nuclear posturing rather than practical defense investments. It\u2019s time to reject this dangerous agenda and demand real national security priorities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7818,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[242,243,244,167,239],"class_list":["post-7817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-defense-spending","tag-military-budget","tag-national-security","tag-nuclear-weapons","tag-pentagon-waste"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/nuclear-weapons-test-nuclear-weapon-weapons-test-explosion-73909.jpeg?fit=1880%2C987&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7817"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7819,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7817\/revisions\/7819"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}