{"id":4317,"date":"2015-12-30T13:40:37","date_gmt":"2015-12-30T19:40:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=4317"},"modified":"2015-12-30T13:40:37","modified_gmt":"2015-12-30T19:40:37","slug":"u-s-foreign-arms-deals-increased-nearly-10-billion-in-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/u-s-foreign-arms-deals-increased-nearly-10-billion-in-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Foreign Arms Deals Increased Nearly $10 Billion in 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"story-continues-1\" class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"239\" data-total-count=\"239\">WASHINGTON \u2014 Foreign arms sales by the United States jumped by almost $10 billion in 2014, about 35 percent, even as the global weapons market remained flat and competition among suppliers increased, a new congressional study has found.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"352\" data-total-count=\"591\">American weapons receipts rose to $36.2 billion in 2014 from $26.7 billion the year before, bolstered by multibillion-dollar agreements with <a class=\"meta-loc\" title=\"More news and information about Qatar.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/international\/countriesandterritories\/qatar\/index.html?inline=nyt-geo\">Qatar<\/a>,<a class=\"meta-loc\" title=\"More news and information about Saudi Arabia.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/international\/countriesandterritories\/saudiarabia\/index.html?inline=nyt-geo\">Saudi Arabia<\/a> and <a title=\"More news and information about South Korea.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/international\/countriesandterritories\/southkorea\/index.html?inline=nyt-geo\">South Korea<\/a>. Those deals and others ensured that the United States remained the single largest provider of arms around the world last year, controlling just over 50 percent of the market.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"254\" data-total-count=\"845\"><a title=\"More news and information about Russia and the Post-Soviet Nations.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/international\/countriesandterritories\/russiaandtheformersovietunion\/index.html?inline=nyt-geo\">Russia<\/a> followed the United States as the top weapons supplier, completing $10.2 billion in sales, compared with $10.3 billion in 2013. Sweden was third, with roughly $5.5 billion in sales, followed by France with $4.4 billion and China with $2.2 billion.<\/p>\n<p id=\"story-continues-2\" class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"475\" data-total-count=\"1320\"><a class=\"meta-loc\" title=\"More news and information about South Korea.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/international\/countriesandterritories\/southkorea\/index.html?inline=nyt-geo\">South Korea<\/a>, a key American ally, was the world\u2019s top weapons buyer in 2014, completing $7.8 billion in contracts. It has faced continued tensions with neighboring North Korea in recent years over the North\u2019s <a title=\"More articles about nuclear weapons.\" href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/news\/science\/topics\/atomic_weapons\/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier\">nuclear weapons<\/a> program and other provocations. The bulk of South Korea\u2019s purchases, worth more than $7 billion, were made with the United States and included transport helicopters and related support, as well as advanced unmanned aerial surveillance vehicles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"143\" data-total-count=\"1463\">Iraq followed South Korea, with $7.3 billion in purchases intended to build up its military in the wake of the American troop withdrawal there.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"152\" data-total-count=\"1615\">Brazil, another developing nation building its military force, was third with $6.5 billion worth of purchase agreements, primarily for Swedish aircraft.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"301\" data-total-count=\"1916\">The report to Congress found that total global arms sales rose slightly in 2014 to $71.8 billion, from $70.1 billion in 2013. Despite that increase, the report concluded that \u201cthe international arms market is not likely growing over all,\u201d because of \u201cthe weakened state of the global economy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p id=\"story-continues-3\" class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"162\" data-total-count=\"2078\">It was the second successive year that global sales remained steady, suggesting that the market has begun to level off after several years of extreme fluctuation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"261\" data-total-count=\"2339\">The lack of market expansion has led to greater competition among suppliers. Some arms producers have adopted measures like flexible financing, counter-trade guarantees and coproduction and co-assembly agreements to try to secure sales, according to the report.<\/p>\n<p id=\"story-continues-4\" class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"362\" data-total-count=\"2701\">\u201cA number of weapons-exporting nations are focusing not only on the clients with which they have held historic competitive advantages due to well-established military-support relationships, but also on potential new clients in countries and regions where they have not been traditional arms suppliers,\u201d the author of the report, Catherine A. Theohary, wrote.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"182\" data-total-count=\"2883\">Despite the competition, the report concluded that, given its positioning, the United States was likely to remain the dominant supplier of arms to developing nations in coming years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"188\" data-total-count=\"3071\">The annual report by the Congressional Research Service, a division of the Library of Congress, was delivered to Congress this week and analyzes trends in arms sales between 2007 and 2014.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"166\" data-total-count=\"3237\">As in previous years, the vast majority of arms were supplied by large, established countries to developing ones, which made $61.8 billion in total purchases in 2014.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"237\" data-total-count=\"3474\" data-node-uid=\"1\">The report is considered among the most detailed nonclassified international arms sales data available to the public. To ensure that information is comparable to 2014 dollars, the report adjusts figures from previous years for inflation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"story-body-text story-content\" data-para-count=\"237\" data-total-count=\"3474\" data-node-uid=\"1\">You can read the original article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/12\/26\/world\/middleeast\/us-foreign-arms-deals-increased-nearly-10-billion-in-2014.html?emc=edit_th_20151226&amp;nl=todaysheadlines&amp;nlid=4580436&amp;_r=0\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 Foreign arms sales by the United States jumped by almost $10 billion in 2014, about 35 percent, even as the global weapons market remained flat and competition among suppliers increased, a new congressional study has found. American weapons receipts rose to $36.2 billion in 2014 from $26.7 billion the year before, bolstered by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2643,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/F35-AF1-AF2-LM1.jpg?fit=920%2C1000&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4317"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4317\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4318,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4317\/revisions\/4318"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}