{"id":3215,"date":"2014-06-23T16:24:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-23T22:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=3215"},"modified":"2014-06-23T16:24:00","modified_gmt":"2014-06-23T22:24:00","slug":"reduced-growler-buy-could-force-boeing-to-restructure-production-line","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/reduced-growler-buy-could-force-boeing-to-restructure-production-line\/","title":{"rendered":"Reduced Growler Buy Could Force Boeing to Restructure Production Line"},"content":{"rendered":"

by\u00a0Dave Majumdar and Sam LaGrone<\/a>, USNI News
\nclick here for original article<\/a><\/p>\n

PENTAGON \u2014 The U.S. Navy and Boeing will have to hash out a new plan to continue producing the EA-18G Growler airborne electronic attack aircraft if the Congress does not provide enough money to buy 22 of the planes.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ll see what the SASC [Senate Armed Services Committee] does and see what the total product looks like. We have the AP [advanced procurement] in hand and we\u2019ll sit down with Boeing and\u2018say, \u2018OK what makes sense here\u2019,\u201d Sean Stackley, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, told reporters at the Pentagon on Friday.
\n\u201cWhat were not going to do is incur additional cost to stretch these out artificially but if we can efficiently attach [these] to the existing contracts. That would be in our best interest.\u201d<\/p>\n

Boeing officials have said previously that the company needs orders for about 22 Growlers to keep the production line going at a minimal efficient rate.<\/p>\n

This week, the House Appropriations Committee (HAC)\u00a0approved a version of the Fiscal Year 2015 appropriations bill<\/a>\u00a0that funded $1.01 billion for 12 of the 22 Growlers the Navy included in its unfunded requirements list submitted to Congress.<\/p>\n

The Navy has said it would use the additional Growlers to beef up its existing electronic attack squadrons from five to seven aircraft.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the fate of the Sikorsky MH-60S\/R hangs in the balance with the fate of USS\u00a0George Washington<\/em>\u00a0(CVN-73). The Pentagon had proposed to retire the nuclear-powered carrier rather than refuel the giant vessel in the fiscal year 2016 budget if the Congressionally-mandated sequestration cuts were to continue. The Congress has fiercely resisted efforts to inactivate George Washington.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will include that carrier in a build of the [Fiscal Year] 16 budget and the final [carrier] decision will be made in projection, with Congress, on FY 16 and out,\u201d Stackley said. \u201cToday, given there\u2019s plenty of uncertainty, we are continuing with the H-60 line but there\u2019s a long way to go between now and the end of the budget process.\u201d<\/p>\n

While the President\u2019s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal includes funding for 29 MH-60 aircraft, the aircraft\u2019s five multi-year procurement contract runs through fiscal 2016. Should the Navy be granted permission to retire\u00a0George Washington<\/em>\u00a0and its associated air wing, the service would not need additional helicopters next year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by\u00a0Dave Majumdar and Sam LaGrone, USNI News click here for original article PENTAGON \u2014 The U.S. Navy and Boeing will have to hash out a new plan to continue producing the EA-18G Growler airborne electronic attack aircraft if the Congress does not provide enough money to buy 22 of the planes. \u201cWe\u2019ll see what the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3215"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3217,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3215\/revisions\/3217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}