{"id":2760,"date":"2014-01-23T12:36:43","date_gmt":"2014-01-23T18:36:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=2760"},"modified":"2014-01-23T12:36:43","modified_gmt":"2014-01-23T18:36:43","slug":"playing-the-defense-jobs-card-isnt-working-anymore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/playing-the-defense-jobs-card-isnt-working-anymore\/","title":{"rendered":"Playing the Defense Jobs Card Isn\u2019t Working Anymore"},"content":{"rendered":"

by\u00a0William D. Hartung<\/a>, Defense One
\nclick here for original article<\/a><\/p>\n

The history of Pentagon spending is rife\u00a0<\/strong>with examples in which programs have been saved from the budget cutter\u2019s axe because of the jobs associated with them.\u00a0 From the revival of the B-1 bomber in the 1980s to the current effort to keep the M-1 tank line open, jobs in key states and districts have provided powerful leverage to contractors seeking to save or extend major procurement programs. But those days may be coming to an\u00a0end.<\/p>\n

For the past two and one-half years, the Aerospace Industries Association, or\u00a0AIA, has repeatedly played the jobs card in an effort to spare the Pentagon budget from automatic cuts called for in 2011\u2019s Budget Control Act.\u00a0 The association sponsored studies claiming that a million jobs would be eliminated if sequester level cuts took effect at the Pentagon, and spread the word far and wide.\u00a0 But despite the partial reprieve supplied by December\u2019s budget agreement, the bulk of the cuts called for by the Budget Control Act are taking effect and the widespread economic damage claimed by the\u00a0AIA\u00a0has not occurred. The jobs card didn\u2019t work, and the massive job losses never\u00a0materialized.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Even if the jobs argument didn\u2019t save the Pentagon top line from reductions, it can still play a role in determining the future of specific weapons systems. The determination of the Congress to continue funding for programs like the M-1 tank and the Global Hawk is evidence that job-driven pork barrel politics is a alive and well. But even in fights over specific programs, the jobs argument isn\u2019t as powerful as it used to\u00a0be.<\/p>\n

The termination of the F-22 combat aircraft \u2014 known as the Raptor \u2014 is a case in point. When the Pentagon decided to end the program at 187 planes, Lockheed Martin and its partners on the project claimed that the program was supporting 95,000 jobs in 44 states. Over 200 members of the House, 44 Senators, 12 governors and the leadership of the International Association of Machinists sent \u201cSave the Raptor\u201d letters to the president, emphasizing the jobs argument. But when the showdown vote came in the Senate, a bipartisan anti-F-22 coalition led by Senate Armed Services Committee leaders Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and John McCain, R-Ariz., carried the day. While liberal Democrats like Patty Murray, D-Wash., Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. \u2014 with significant F-22 work in their states \u2014 voted for the program, their votes were offset by Republican budget hawks like Sens. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., John Ensign, R-Nev., and Mike Enzi, R-Utah, who voted against the F-22. The jobs argument\u00a0failed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by\u00a0William D. Hartung, Defense One click here for original article The history of Pentagon spending is rife\u00a0with examples in which programs have been saved from the budget cutter\u2019s axe because of the jobs associated with them.\u00a0 From the revival of the B-1 bomber in the 1980s to the current effort to keep the M-1 tank […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2760"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2760\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2763,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2760\/revisions\/2763"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}