{"id":2424,"date":"2013-10-29T10:15:53","date_gmt":"2013-10-29T16:15:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=2424"},"modified":"2013-10-29T10:15:53","modified_gmt":"2013-10-29T16:15:53","slug":"house-hearing-to-examine-b-61-warhead-modernization-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/house-hearing-to-examine-b-61-warhead-modernization-program\/","title":{"rendered":"House Hearing to Examine B-61 Warhead Modernization Program"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Nuclear Threat Initiative<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nti.org\/gsn\/article\/house-hearing-examine-b-61-warhead-modernization-program\/\">click here for original article<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A House Armed Services Committee subpanel on Tuesday is slated to examine efforts to modernize the B-61 nuclear warhead, a program that has been troubled by escalating costs and schedule over-runs brought on by budget cuts and management issues.<\/p>\n<p>Members of the HASC Strategic Forces Subcommittee are scheduled to hear testimony from Donald Cook, deputy administrator for defense programs at the National Nuclear Security Administration; Madelyn Creedon, assistant secretary of Defense; and Air Force Gen. Robert Kehler, head of Strategic Command.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nti.org\/gsn\/article\/b-61-updates-divide-congressional-spending-panels\/\">refurbishment<\/a>\u00a0of the U.S. arsenal of B-61 gravity bombs &#8212; approximately 200 of which are still fielded at six overseas bases belonging to NATO allies &#8212; is now projected to cost a total of $8.2 billion, according to the National Nuclear Security Administration. However, a separate assessment conducted by the Defense Department&#8217;s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office found the final price tag would probably be nearer to $10.4 billion, noted the Project On Government Oversight in a recent\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pogo.org\/blog\/2013\/10\/congressional-panel-to-review-b61-nuclear-weapons-spiraling-costs.html\">blog post<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A $30 million cut to the program&#8217;s fiscal 2013 budget necessitated by &#8220;sequestration&#8221; budget cuts is expected to bring the project six more months behind schedule. The lowered budget and schedule delay means the B-61 Life Extension Program likely will rise by another estimated $230 million, according to the POGO analysis.<\/p>\n<p>NNSA officials are currently enacting $60 million in fiscal 2014 cuts to the project as a result of program management changes and the continued imposition of the automatic, across-the-board sequestration cuts spurred in part by the 2011 Budget Control Act<\/p>\n<p>The gravity bomb&#8217;s life-extension program is presently in the development and engineering stage. The effort is intended to modernize both nuclear and non-nuclear parts of the decades-old warhead, which has already been in service 10 years longer than was first planned, according to an NNSA\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nnsa.energy.gov\/mediaroom\/pressreleases\/droptest082913\">press release<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The modernization effort has been opposed by arms-control advocates who question its expense and efficacy given the Obama administration&#8217;s stated ambition of further reducing the U.S. nuclear arsenal through negotiated bilateral cuts with Russia that are hoped to encompass tactical warheads such as the B-61.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s important that our elected officials realize the extent to which the costs of this program have spiraled out of control,&#8221; wrote POGO national security analyst Ethan Rosenkraanz, whose organization is focused on exposing government misconduct, waste and corruption.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Given the current economic climate, asking U.S. taxpayers to shoulder the burden of refurbishing this weapon without a critical mission and plagued with cost overruns is irresponsible,&#8221; Rosenkraanz said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Nuclear Threat Initiative click here for original article A House Armed Services Committee subpanel on Tuesday is slated to examine efforts to modernize the B-61 nuclear warhead, a program that has been troubled by escalating costs and schedule over-runs brought on by budget cuts and management issues. Members of the HASC Strategic Forces Subcommittee [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2425,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/B61-11_WhitemanTransport.jpg?fit=236%2C280&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2424"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2426,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2424\/revisions\/2426"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}