{"id":1013,"date":"2013-02-20T13:33:56","date_gmt":"2013-02-20T19:33:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/?p=1013"},"modified":"2013-02-20T13:33:56","modified_gmt":"2013-02-20T19:33:56","slug":"how-the-sequester-could-affect-health-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/how-the-sequester-could-affect-health-care\/","title":{"rendered":"How The Sequester Could Affect Health Care"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/news.stlpublicradio.org\/people\/julie-rovner\">Julie Rovner<\/a>, St. Louis Public Radio<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/news.stlpublicradio.org\/post\/how-sequester-could-affect-health-care\">Click here for original article<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s looking\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/on-the-money\/budget\/283339-with-2-weeks-until-deadline-85b-sequester-looks-inevitable\">increasingly likely<\/a>\u00a0that $85 billion of automatic federal budget cuts known as a sequester will come to pass if Congress doesn&#8217;t act by March 1.<\/p>\n<p>Congress and President Obama agreed on the cuts, which will be divided evenly between defense and domestic programs, including health care, back in the summer of 2011 as part of a last-ditch effort to force a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/bipartisanpolicy.org\/blog\/2011\/08\/how-sequester-works-if-joint-select-committee-fails\">deficit-reduction deal<\/a>\u00a0and avert a debt limit default.<\/p>\n<p>Daniel Werfel of the Office of Management and Budget explained last week in testimony before the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.appropriations.senate.gov\/news.cfm?method=news.view&amp;id=02f63d44-4541-4e04-bbb0-75ae7c780e3a\">Senate Appropriations Committee<\/a>: &#8220;Agencies would be required to implement the cuts over the remaining seven months of the fiscal year, meaning that in many programs the effective cuts would be closer to 9 percent for nondefense programs and 13 percent for defense programs when compared to what agencies would spend during this period under normal circumstances.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Obama administration has been arguing for months that such cuts would have, if not devastating, at least highly painful effects on programs that affect real people.<\/p>\n<p>According to a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.appropriations.senate.gov\/ht-full.cfm?method=hearings.view&amp;id=17d3dc99-c065-4bec-a7c8-cfd374bf41a3\">letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee<\/a>\u00a0from Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the required cuts &#8220;would result in about 3,000 fewer inpatient admissions and 804,000 fewer outpatient visits provided in [Indian Health Service] and tribal hospitals and clinics.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sebelius said the reduced funding would also result in 424,000 fewer HIV tests conducted by grantees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and &#8220;2,100 fewer domestic and foreign facility inspections of firms that manufacture food products to verify that domestic and imported foods meet safety standards&#8221; by the Food and Drug Administration.<\/p>\n<p>Medicaid and the Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program are exempt from the automatic cuts, as are many other\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/sgp\/crs\/misc\/R42050.pdf\">safety-net programs and Social Security<\/a>. But Medicare is not. Well, not completely.<\/p>\n<p>Under a specially negotiated provision, Medicare beneficiaries will not be subject to benefit cuts. But Medicare providers can be docked up to 2 percent.<\/p>\n<p>That has prompted a loud outcry from the health care industry. A\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nursingworld.org\/FunctionalMenuCategories\/MediaResources\/PressReleases\/2012-PR\/Report-Finds-Sequester-of-Medicare-Spending-Could-Lead-to-Jobs-Lost.pdf\">joint study<\/a>\u00a0funded last year by the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.aha.org\/\">American Hospital Association<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nursingworld.org\/\">American Nurses Association<\/a>\u00a0and<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ama-assn.org\/\">American Medical Association<\/a>\u00a0estimated that should the cuts take effect, nearly a half a million health care jobs could be lost in just the first year.<\/p>\n<p>Also not exempt from the cuts is most of the funding for the Affordable Care Act, despite the last-minute efforts of states and the federal government to prepare for next year&#8217;s rollout of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/reform.healthfoundation.org\/2014-timeline\">most of the law&#8217;s big benefits<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A program that will not be cut, however, is the one providing insurance for people with pre-existing conditions. Last Friday the administration announced it would\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pcip.gov\/\">not accept any new applications for the program<\/a>, to preserve the program&#8217;s remaining funds until the end of the year. That&#8217;s when those currently enrolled can transition into new health insurance coverage under the law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By\u00a0Julie Rovner, St. Louis Public Radio Click here for original article It&#8217;s looking\u00a0increasingly likely\u00a0that $85 billion of automatic federal budget cuts known as a sequester will come to pass if Congress doesn&#8217;t act by March 1. Congress and President Obama agreed on the cuts, which will be divided evenly between defense and domestic programs, including [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1014,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/172421911.jpeg?fit=3647%2C2732&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1013"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1013\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1015,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1013\/revisions\/1015"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1014"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peaceeconomyproject.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}