Reevaluating Defense Spending

By Katerina Canyon, Executive Director, Peace Economy Project

Boeing’s recent $211 million delivery order to provide flight control surface spares for the F/A-18 E/F and E/A-18G aircraft is a testament to the ongoing investment in maintaining and enhancing the tactical aviation capabilities of the U.S. Navy and the Royal Australian Air Force. This substantial contract, which will see $98 million in U.S. Navy funds and $5.3 million from the Royal Australian Air Force, highlights the critical importance placed on defense readiness and the operational longevity of these fighter jets.

While the necessity of maintaining advanced military equipment is undisputed, this significant allocation of resources raises important questions about the broader implications of our defense spending priorities. As the Naval Supply Systems Command Weapon Systems Support in Philadelphia directs the majority of this work to Hazelwood, Missouri, with additional efforts in St. Louis, Missouri, through July 2032, we must consider how these expenditures fit into the larger picture of national and global security.

The Peace Economy Perspective

At the Peace Economy Project, we advocate for a balanced approach to security—one that not only ensures military readiness but also addresses the fundamental needs of our society. The $211 million contract awarded to Boeing represents a significant investment that could alternatively be directed toward critical domestic programs. These programs could include healthcare, education, infrastructure, and other social services that contribute to the overall well-being and security of our communities.

Opportunity Costs of Defense Spending

Every dollar spent on defense is a dollar not spent on social programs that can directly improve the quality of life for citizens. The opportunity cost of this $211 million delivery order is substantial. For instance, these funds could support the construction of new schools, the improvement of healthcare facilities, or the expansion of social services that provide essential support to vulnerable populations.

A Call for Reevaluation

As we move forward, it is crucial to reevaluate our spending priorities. Ensuring national security is paramount, but it should not come at the expense of neglecting other critical areas that contribute to the security and prosperity of our nation. A more balanced allocation of resources could foster a stronger, healthier, and more resilient society.

Looking Ahead

The Peace Economy Project calls on policymakers and stakeholders to consider the long-term benefits of a diversified investment strategy. By redirecting a portion of military spending to essential social programs, we can build a foundation for sustainable security that encompasses both defense readiness and societal well-being.

Boeing’s $211 million contract is a reminder of the scale of our defense investments. Let it also be a catalyst for a broader discussion on how best to allocate our resources to achieve a holistic approach to security and prosperity.

Katerina Canyon

Executive Director, Peace Economy Project